The Paradox of Clinton Winning and the Presidency Losing
Richard M. Pious describes a paradoxical outcome of the Clinton impeachment: the president staved off personal catastrophe and inflicted political damage on his opponents, but did so at the expense of the institutional protections of testimonial privilege, a result that will be damaging to the presidential office in the future.
Presidential Machismo: Executive Authority, Military Intervention, and Foreign Relations, Alexander DeConde Reviewed by Richard M. Pious
The Cuban Missile Crisis and the Limits of Crisis Management, Richard M. Pious
Argument without End: In Search of Answers to the Vietnam Tragedy, Robert S. McNamara Reviewed by Richard M. Pious
The True Size of Government, Paul C. Light Reviewed by Richard M. Piousmore by this author
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Women's History Month
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.