Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: The Changing Criteria
Robert B. Horwitz examines the evolution of American administrative law. He argues that the standard of judicial review that seemed to embody the conservative reaction to the so-called imperious judiciary paradoxically accounts for the distinctly checkered judicial treatment of deregulation.
Neoconservative Politics and the Supreme Court: Law, Power, and Democracy, Stephen M. Feldman Reviewed by Robert B. Horwitz
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
CHINA IN A WORLD OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.