This book is an important contribution to the study of opposition candidacy. Using rich evidence from Tanzania, Weghorst addresses an outstanding puzzle for academics and policymakers alike: why do opposition politicians stand for election in electoral autocracies? Existing explanations come from advanced democracies and focus on simple cost-benefit analyses. Candidates enter a race as opposition if the expected benefits of becoming a legislator exceed the risks of standing. Weghorst explores how this framework fails to account for opposition candidacy in countries like Tanzania, where opposition prospects of winning power are so low and the risks of violence and intimidation are so high. This question is critical because cases where the ruling party is hegemonic and the playing field is uneven, like Tanzania, are the norm, not the exception.
Weghorst argues that the eve of the campaign is not the correct juncture to understand why opposition politicians stand. In the absence of well-institutionalized opposition parties, it is in civil society organizations that future opposition candidates earn their stripes resisting the regime. This sets them on a path toward opposition candidacy while regime politicians take a very distinct path to candidacy through service to the ruling party, often starting in childhood. That means the candidate’s election-time deci
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
CHINA IN A WORLD OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.