PREVIOUS ARTICLE ALL CONTENTS Next ARTICLE

Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making, Rachael K. Hinkle and Morgan Hazelton

Reviewed by Rachel A. Spooner
 

Legal briefs are the primary way that litigants and interested parties communicate with the justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. In Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle utilize a mixed-methods approach, combining more than 25,000 briefs with in-depth interviews with former law clerks and attorneys that have experience before the Court, to offer an investigation of how merits briefs function. The authors offer insights as to how briefs affect the decisions that justices make and ultimately provide concrete strategies that will be of interest to practitioners, as well.

While scholars have long theorized about how information influences the justices’ decision-making, in the first half of the book, Hazelton and Hinkle evaluate how litigants and amici produce and present the information in the first place. In chapter two, the authors tackle the craft of merits brief writing and hypothesize that higher-quality briefs are more likely to be produced by parties with resource, experience, and expertise advantages. Hazelton and Hinkle measure quality as a combination of the amount, type, and presentation of information (63). While admittedly a coarse measure, the authors use quantity—a simple word count—as a proxy for the amount of information attorneys relay to t

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor

ROBERT Y. SHAPIRO

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

CONFERENCES & EVENTS

America at a Crossroads: The 2024 Presidential Election and Its Global Impact
April 24, 2024
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. ET
New York, NY

MORE ABOUT THIS EVENT VIEW ALL EVENTS

Editor’s spotlight

Virtual Issue

Introduction: Black Power and the Civil Rights Agendas of Charles V. Hamilton
Marylena Mantas and Robert Y. Shapiro

MORE ABOUT THIS TOPIC

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

China in a World of Great Power Competition   CHINA IN A WORLD OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS