pp. 35-57
Who Asked You? The (Dis)Use of Questions Presented at the U.S. Supreme Court
Claire Wofford AND Matthew Reid Krell analyze the United States Supreme Court’s policymaking efforts and its exercise of agenda-setting power. They argue that when the Court agrees to hear a case it also determines what legal questions it will answer in that case. They assess the argument by investigating the variation in the Court’s acceptance, alteration, and addition of questions presented (QPs) in petitions for the writ of certiorari.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Academy Forum | Latino Voters, Demographic Determinism, and the Myth of an Inevitable Democratic Party Majority
October 9, 2024
4:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. ET
WEBINAR
Virtual Issue
Introduction: Black Power and the Civil Rights Agendas of Charles V. Hamilton
Marylena Mantas and Robert Y. Shapiro
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson
view additional issuesArticles | Book reviews
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.