pp. 35-57
Who Asked You? The (Dis)Use of Questions Presented at the U.S. Supreme Court
Claire Wofford AND Matthew Reid Krell analyze the United States Supreme Court’s policymaking efforts and its exercise of agenda-setting power. They argue that when the Court agrees to hear a case it also determines what legal questions it will answer in that case. They assess the argument by investigating the variation in the Court’s acceptance, alteration, and addition of questions presented (QPs) in petitions for the writ of certiorari.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
APS Forum | Book Talk - The Insiders' Game: How Elites Make War and Peace
June 22, 2026
WEBINAR
CONTRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL SCIENCE
Governing by Decree: The Trump Presidency and the Decline of “Legislating Together”
Desmond King
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson
view additional issuesArticles | Book reviews
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.