Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism, Luke C. Sheahan
Everyone loves voluntary associations, right? They help people pool resources, advance common projects, meet social needs, and much else. Indeed, for some, they are the linchpin of well-functioning democratic societies—except for the ones we do not like: the ones with odd or noxious beliefs, restrictive memberships or rules, and the like. Those we would just as well like to see disbanded or reconstructed or at least severely constrained. After all, democracy might not survive so well if we let people associate simply on their own unregulated terms.
Of course, that “we” disagree on which associations fall into which category and what we should do about them, if anything, is compounded by the fact that the U.S. Constitution pretty clearly protects the right of association, though what that right consists of is, thanks to a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, muddled and weak. In Liberty's Refuge, John Inazu traced the ways in which the Supreme Court's abandonment of the textual “right of assembly” in favor of a “right of association” has produced a thinly reasoned set of justifications that amount to offering protections to associations only if they are “intimate” or politically “expressive.”
Luke C. Sheahan's fine book Why Associations Matter pus
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON AMERICAN POLITICS
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.