The Rights Paradox: How Group Attitudes Shape U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy, Michael A. Zilis

Reviewed by Jessica A. Schoenherr



As Alexander Hamilton explains in Federalist No. 78, one of the U.S. Supreme Court's fundamental tasks is protecting minority rights. But the court does not do this on its own; endowed with “merely judgment,” it issues decisions and the other branches enforce them. Institutional legitimacy, or the public's belief that the Supreme Court has the authority to issue the rulings that it does, thus forms the foundation of the court's power, and the justices protect the court's legitimacy by adhering to norms and expectations surrounding their jobs, including issuing legally principled decisions and protecting minority rights. As public reaction to cases such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) makes clear, however, the public does not always respond positively to decisions that favor minority rights. In The Rights Paradox, Michael A. Zilis asks whether the Supreme Court also risks its own legitimacy when it issues rulings that protect minority rights in the face of popular scorn. Zilis finds that it does, and that the court might be less willing to protect minority rights as a result.

Adding to an ongoing conversation about what affects the Supreme Court's legitimacy, Zilis suggests that group-based attitudes might be as fundamental to someone's feelings about the court as core democratic values or ideo

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor


Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.


America at a Crossroads: The 2024 Presidential Election and Its Global Impact
April 24, 2024
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. ET
New York, NY


Editor’s spotlight

Virtual Issue

Introduction: Black Power and the Civil Rights Agendas of Charles V. Hamilton
Marylena Mantas and Robert Y. Shapiro


Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

China in a World of Great Power Competition   CHINA IN A WORLD OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS