Share this

Restoring the Global Judiciary: Why the Supreme Court Should Rule in U.S. Foreign Affairs, Martin S. Flaherty

Reviewed by Lisa Hager



Martin S. Flaherty’s book advances the argument that the U.S. Supreme Court should discontinue its subservience to the president in foreign affairs and regain its role within the separation of powers framework as a check on executive power in domestic and foreign affairs. The current imbalance of power among the three branches of government is due to globalization increasing the power of the president, a trend noticeable not just in the United States but worldwide.

Flaherty contends that it is the Supreme Court, not Congress, that is best able to rein in the president. Congress is ill equipped to restrain the president because of frequent turnover in membership, the propensity to hastily enact statutes in response to international threats (for example, the PATRIOT Act), and reliance on executive branch information. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, is empowered by the Constitution to interpret the law and check executive and legislative actions. Additionally, the justices can do so without fear of retribution because they are largely insulated from political pressure through their lifetime appointments to the bench. Lifetime tenure, along with the fact that the Supreme Court can and does reverse precedent, is why Flaherty argues that the justices can withstand any criticism associated with ending executive deference in foreign affairs and bec

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor


Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.


Book Talk | Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive
May 24, 2022


Editor’s spotlight

Women's History Month

Woodrow Wilson, Alice Paul, and the Woman Suffrage Movement
Sally Hunter Graham

The Year of the Woman? Candidates, Voters, and the 1992 Elections
Ester R. Fuchs and Michael X. Delli Carpini


Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

Perspectives on Presidential Elections, 1992–2020   PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS