Share this

New Frames and National Security: Covering Big Brother, Douglas M. McLeod and Dhavan V. Shah

Reviewed by Kristene Unsworth



The media has the power to influence the way the public views events. This statement is widely accepted, yet examples of the fact still leave one with a feeling of surprise that our opinions can be manipulated in both acknowledged and less acknowledged ways. Douglas M. McLeod and Dhavan V. Shah explore this by advancing the concept of communication framing effects. “[F]raming can be found throughout the social sciences as a way of describing how messages, based on certain patterns of emphasis and exclusion, can structure the thinking of the people who encounter them” (p. 11). The researchers look specifically at the distinction between individual and collective frames and cueing. Cueing is similar to framing in that it brings form to a portion of the message. While a frame relates to a story or event as a whole, a cue brings meaning to a specific concept. McLeod and Shah aim, in part, to bring into focus “framing effects” research and cueing through experiments that altered certain features of news stories related to the “war on terror” in order to determine audience response.

Their work leads to the development of two new models: the Message Framing Model (MFM) and the Message Processing Model (MPM). These models present “frame building (how frames become manifest in texts) and frame setting (how frames come to influen

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor


Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.


Book Talk | Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive
May 24, 2022


Editor’s spotlight

Women's History Month

Woodrow Wilson, Alice Paul, and the Woman Suffrage Movement
Sally Hunter Graham

The Year of the Woman? Candidates, Voters, and the 1992 Elections
Ester R. Fuchs and Michael X. Delli Carpini


Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

Perspectives on Presidential Elections, 1992–2020   PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS