pp. 164-165

Why Washington Won’t Work, Marc J. Hetherington and Thomas J. Rudolph

Reviewed by Laurel Harbridge
   Facebook

   Twitter

   E-mail
 

Contemporary American politics is often characterized by partisan conflict and gridlock. When paired with debate about the extent of polarization in the mass public, congressional behavior provokes the question, “Why, then, do citizens continue to allow their representatives to do such a poor job representing them?” (p. 1). Marc J. Hetherington and Thomas J. Rudolph begin their book with this question. The answer, they argue, is the growing polarization of trust in government, which precludes policy consensus and pressure for action.

This is a timely book that addresses concerns of academics and political observers alike. Hetherington and Rudolph delve into important contemporary issues, including legislative productivity, public support for government policies, and, ultimately, representation. Their findings point to one way the public provides perverse incentives for politicians. The public may want action and solutions to pressing problems, but it does not provide a consensus on specific policies and the resulting impetus for government responsiveness. While compelling, the authors could do even more here to note how the institutional structures of elections promote dyadic rather than collective responsiveness. The authors could then address more directly how their arguments about trust in government enter into this distinction.

Beyond

To continue reading, see options above.

More by This Author

Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America, Hans Noel
Reviewed by Laurel Harbridge

Congress: A Performance Appraisal, Andrew J. Taylor
Reviewed by Laurel Harbridge

About PSQ's Editor

Demetrios James Caraley

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

From the Archives

North Korea

North Korea's Weapons of Mass Destruction: Badges, Shields, or Swords?

Victor D. Cha examines the question about relative merits of engaging or containing North Korea.

MORE ABOUT THIS TOPIC

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

New APS Book

Continuing Issues in U.S. National Security Policy   CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected
newsstand locator
About APS